Hi Matthias On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 4:47 PM Matthias Kuhn <matth...@opengis.ch> wrote:
> Hi Martin, > I think that's a good move. Having an experimental Python 3D API is better > than not having a Python 3D API. And if it's communicated clearly, it's > every developers choice to build something on top of an unstable API. > Just to ask, do you have clear plans for API changes or is it more a move > to keep the door for API modifications open in case it turns out it is > required? > I don't really have any concrete plans for API changes within the 3D library - I just feel that it may easily happen in the future as we will be adding more functionality or refactoring existing code :-) Anyway I would try to keep the changes in API break docs so that devs have some guidance in case there are some breaks. Cheers Martin
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
