Hi Even,
We tried to add the qgs namespace as a prefix:
qgs:alias
in the DescribeFeatureType response.
Unfortunately it didn't make Geomedia happy. But as you said - that
depends how it is coded.
I also asked them what we should do with the alias attribute. Let's see
what they respond.
Thanks,
Andreas
On 2019-02-27 10:59, Even Rouault wrote:
On mercredi 27 février 2019 10:39:02 CET Andreas Neumann wrote:
Hi,
We are trying to connect Geomedia Desktop 2018 to our QGIS 3.6 WFS
Server - but fail.
Geomedia complains about the extra "alias" attributes in the
DescribeFeatureType response:
See also our temporary URL:
http://linnode3.geo.zg.ch:8080/ows/Gewaessernetz?SERVICE=WFS&REQUEST=Describ
eFeatureType
Questions:
* Is the "alias" element valid or invalid according to the WFS spec?
It is invalid. The schema returned by the above requst doesn't validate
against the XML schema of XML schema :-) from
https://www.w3.org/2009/XMLSchema/XMLSchema.xsd
* If yes, could we move the alias attribute to our own qgs namespace?
Yes, using qgsextension:alias would validate XMLSchema.xsd as it has a
provision for extra attributes in another namespaces.
That doesn't mean that Geomedia would be ready for it though. Depends on how
it is coded...
Even
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
