Not sure about the changes in QT 6 but I think if the API breaks we
should call it QGIS 4.
And when the API breaks anyway, I would love to have the geometry model
improved and am willing to help.
Raymond
On 25-06-19 11:41, Nyall Dawson wrote:
Hi all,
Following conversation from https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/30234, I
think it would be beneficial if we start the conversation happening
about QGIS 4.0, and to throw some thoughts about timelines out there.
**Before anyone panics -- I'm expecting multi-year time frames here!
But I think we should START this discussion, and have at least some
idea of the time frames we're all aiming toward for a future 4.0
release.**
For reference: Qt upstream has previously hinted at November 2020 for
Qt 6, at which stage support for 5.x will be dropped. Discussions so
far are moving toward Qt 6 being a "gentle" cleaning, so there's
likely (hopefully?) not a lot we'll be forced to do to adapt to this.
I think we should aim for a similar goal -- a "gentle" API break, as
opposed to the huge-clean-and-break-everything-we-possibly-can
approach we took for 3.x (with good reason!).
Thoughts?
Nyall
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
[email protected]
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
[email protected]
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
