Hi Even, On Sat, 23. Nov 2019 at 17:36:52 +0100, Even Rouault wrote: > But for the future, I can imagine we could have: > qgis3_10 depending on gdal3 (or possibly even gdal3_0 ?) and proj6 and > qt_whatever_we_use_currently > And qgis3_12 could decide to upgrade one of its dependencies without > impacting > qgis3_10.
Yes, that's the route I might have followed if 3.4 didn't (claim to) support PROJ 6. Although I would have sticked with qgis-ltr and qgis and just added proj5 and gdal2. Jürgen -- Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel. +49-4931-918175-31 Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13 Fax. +49-4931-918175-50 Software Engineer D-26506 Norden https://www.norbit.de QGIS release manager (PSC) Germany IRC: jef on FreeNode
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
