вт, 3 груд. 2019 о 14:07 Giovanni Manghi <giovanni.man...@gmail.com> пише: > Said that if the "official" way to support SAGA would be a plugin it > would be much easier to implement and distribute/update such changes.
If I recall correctly this was discussed a lot in the mailing lists before 3.0 release and most developers involved into Processing support was agains keeping SAGA and adding any new providers while some community members were pushing hard to keep them. Final decision at the Madeira meeting was to keep SAGA and include OTB with one of the arguments that this way it will be easier for community to maintain them. Now we have SAGA in core and at least 2 plugins for SAGA and very little (I'd even say zero) community involvement in any of them. Do we really want to restart this discussion? I don't think that two involved parties have changed their mind. Also it is probably too early as no breaking changes can be made before 4.0 and even if we make a decision now it anyway very likely will be revised again before release as it happened last time. -- Alexander Bruy _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer