Hi all. Il 16/01/20 14:39, Andreas Neumann ha scritto:
>> * do we want a cap on cost and time difference between transportation >> method? e.g. train is to be used when cost or duration are no more than >> x times flight cost or duration > We don't want a lot of bureaucracy or a "travel police" ;-) we should > trust on common sense and the good will of our participants. I think > most QGIS people are environmentally sensitive anyway. I don't understand this. The question was (sorry if unclear): should we only reimburse train travel, whathever the cost and the duration, or this should be done until a certain difference? e.g. (numbers made up) train 10 h, 100 € | flight 8 h, 80 € > train train 20 h, 300 € | flight 23 h, 50 € > flight >> * do we want to engage in proactive environmental actions? e.g. donating >> to the environmental agencies|NGOs|etc. specific tools to evaluate and >> reduce impact? e.g. a QGIS ad hoc grant with a specific budget for it > > No. Definitely no donations from our donations. That's not the purpose > of QGIS.ORG. again, I was probably unclear. the purpose of QGIS.ORG is certainly to provide the best GIS tools to everyone. as a direct contribution towards a more sustainable planet we could donate tools especially useful to plan and reduce impacts. Cheers. -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS.ORG Chair: http://planet.qgis.org/planet/user/28/tag/qgis%20board/ _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer