Thank you for the follow-up, Raphael. I'm now up to date and all works for me.
My original message was just before the mad scramble to re-release 3.10.x with 3.0.3 and 6.3.0 (and in fact may together with the associated bug reports have prompted it). My appreciation to the developers for the quick followup (doubtless displacing whatever Nyall et al meant to be doing last week..), and for doing their best to maintain a complex and very capable geospatial software ecosystem. Not easy, in the open-source or commercial software environments. I think there are lessons to be learnt about what should trigger (and, on the flip side, be allowed in) _._._-x, _._.x, and _.x releases. In particular, given the criticality I suspect it would have been better to withdraw 3.10.2 and issue the fix as 3.10.3. And (earlier) to not try to backport the Proj4->Proj6 shift into QGIS 3.4.x at all. (And maybe to not change custom projection functionality as much between 3.10.1 and 3.10.2, waiting until 3.12.) But I realize we were scrambling to fix the darn thing rather than splitting hairs on versioning, and I think we can wait for the devs' PTSD symptoms to abate somewhat before conclusive postmortems! Thanks again, Martin From: Raphael Das Gupta <raphael.das.gu...@hsr.ch> Sent: January 28, 2020 07:16 To: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org Cc: perg...@gmail.com Subject: Not all QGIS 3.10.2 downloads did contain the upgraded GDAL and PROJ versions (Re: [QGIS-Developer] What GDAL and PROJ versions with 3.10.2?) Hi again On 20.01.20 11:45, perg...@gmail.com <mailto:perg...@gmail.com> wrote: I installed 3.10.2 (OSGeo4W installer) over the weekend, and I'm running into a bunch of issues (zoom crashes - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/33902; corrupted output from georeferencer, custom CRS that has lost its USER:xxxxx label). Before I try to pick them off one by one, is it possible the right dependencies didn't make it into the install? My About. screen says I have GDAL 3.0.2 and PROJ "6.2.1 dated Nov 1", which makes me suspicious. Apparently, the first Windows builds of release 3.10.2 still included older versions of GDAL/OGR and PROJ. See this thread <https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2020-January/thread.html#5 9948> on this list. https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2020-January/060001.html seems to indicate that 3.10.2 was re-released some time before 2020-01-23 16:16 PST (2020-01-24 00:16 UTC). So if you downloaded QGIS 3.10.2 before that, you should re-download it to not suffer from the bugs of the old library versions. I don't know why the 3.10.2 was re-released instead of releasing 3.10.3 with the upgraded library versions as suggested in that mailing list thread (here <https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2020-January/059983.html> and here <https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2020-January/059986.html> ). Releasing it as 3.10.3 would have made it more clear to users, which version they actually downloaded and would have been more in line with semantic versioning concepts. (I dunno whether QGIS aims to follow semantic versioning conventions.) Kind regards, Raphael
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer