Hi all, I would like to ask what would be considered best practice for an issuer to handle stale pull requests. In the cases that a review was made and further changes are expected from the contributor, it is obvious that unless the changes are applied the PR should be closed. My question is about PRs that have received no suggestions or no comments whatsoever. I don't want in any way to sound pushy, I can see the length of the PR list and I know most (if not all) are just donating time to the project, that's why I ask here. Should I just close and reopen the PR to reset the stale timer and wait? Should I add an "up" comment to reset stale timer or a comment asking for attention? Should I ask someone specific for a review? (who?)
Best regards, Stefanos -- Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-Developer-f4099106.html _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
