Hi Nyall,
I had a brief look in the grant proposal form, to double check what we
said in the "call for grant proposals":
It says:
"This year, we will not accept proposals for the development of new
features. Therefore, proposals should focus on improving the QGIS
project infrastructure and polishing existing features."
From this statement it should be clear that new features shouldn't be
put forward for voting.
I think it makes sense to rediscuss this decision every year, as in the
future we might be in the position that we also fund new feature
development - who knows ...
Greetings,
Andreas
Am 25.05.20 um 08:43 schrieb Nyall Dawson:
On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 16:19, Anita Graser <anitagra...@gmx.at> wrote:
On 26.04.2020 11:51, Anita Graser wrote:
Dear QGIS Community,
Our previous rounds of grant proposals have always been a great success. We are
very pleased to announce that this year’s round of grants is now available. The
call is open to anybody who wants to make a funded contribution to QGIS,
subject to the call conditions outlined in the application form. The deadline
for this round is in four weeks: 24th May 2020.
The submission phase is over now. This means that we are now entering the 2
week QEP discussion period (ending 7th June 2020)
We received 14 submissions. The submitted QEP links are:
Hi Anita,
We clearly have a few submissions which definitively fall into the
"new feature" category. Shouldn't these be rejected outright?
Nyall
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
