Hi, > Hi all, > > A dedicated logo and a dedicated landing page would be great (we could > use server.qgis.org for example). Part of QGIS Server "identity" problem > is because people think it as some QGIS additional feature. Not as > something that can be deployed in a headless server, independently of > QGIS. In fact, QGIS and QGIS Server share the same code base, but from a > functional point of view, they are different applications, for different > purposes. As developers, we put all the code in the same repo, but as > marketeers, we should sell two different products :-) > > People looking for "map servers" should go there. Developers/sysops > should be able to deploy new QGIS Server instances from there. > > Thank you Alexandre for volunteer. Julien, as far as I understood, will > lead this QEP implementation. Thank you both.
Thank you Alexandre for proposing your help, we will come back to you when we start. > > Regards, > > Jorge > > On 06/07/20 21:55, Alexandre Neto wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I agree the QGIS server deserves its own "document" in QGIS docs. >> >> I Wouldn't mind assisting with that. Always a good opportunity to learn >> more about it. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Alexandre >> >> A segunda, 6/07/2020, 15:36, Julien Cabieces >> <julien.cabie...@oslandia.com <mailto:julien.cabie...@oslandia.com>> >> escreveu: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > During our recent meeting about QGIS Server it was pointed out that >> > QGIS Server does not have all the visibility that it deserves. >> > >> > One of the possible actions is to move the server documentation to its >> > own independent chapter. >> > >> >> +1 >> >> > The server documentation is now mainly mainly buried deep under >> > >> >> https://docs.qgis.org/3.10/en/docs/user_manual/working_with_ogc/server/index.html >> > >> > A few other resources are in: >> > the training manual: >> > >> https://docs.qgis.org/3.10/en/docs/training_manual/qgis_server/index.html >> > and >> > >> https://docs.qgis.org/3.10/en/docs/pyqgis_developer_cookbook/server.html >> > >> > I was wondering this activity a could be performed as a part of the >> > paid/funded activity >> > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/184 >> >> Yes, I believe it should. We'll do it while we realize the QEP. >> >> > >> > Kind regards >> >> _______________________________________________ >> QGIS-Developer mailing list >> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org> >> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> QGIS-Developer mailing list >> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org >> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> > > J. Gustavo _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
