Hi,
I just wanted to advertise that I'm working on builing python binding for QGIS with Qt6/PyQt6 . It's here : https://github.com/troopa81/QGIS/tree/build_qt6_ci_pyqt This is still draft, there is a lot of hacky stuff and commented code but I managed to build bindings for all modules and run sucessfully some tests (not all). I hope I could propose a WIP PR by the end of the week so we could discuss about this. Regards, Julien > On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 18:45, Julien Cabieces via QGIS-PSC > <qgis-...@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> Thank you for the meeting minutes! >> >> I'm already planning to continue the effort in >> porting/fixing code for Qt6 in the next months using Oslandia own >> funding, so I'm candidate to join the working group. >> >> > ND: major missing bit: python support. Bulk of the tests are thus not >> > running >> > Packaging issues - Sandro Mani looking into python stuff for fedora >> > (QVariant issues) >> >> Is there a reason why we are switching from ubuntu for Qt5 builds to >> fedora for Qt6 builds ? Because there is already PyQt6 packages in >> ubuntu:22.10. > > Initially Fedora was the *only* platform offering qt6 binaries, so all > the CI setup was done using that. But now that Ubuntu/etc have caught > up I still think it's a good idea to leave the CI with Fedora so that > we get a better spread of testing environments. (Fedora generally has > much more recent gdal/geos/proj/etc so by running CI on this > environment we're more likely to catch issues/test differences across > a wider range of library versions) > > Nyall > > >> >> Regards, >> Julien >> >> >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > Here is some feedback about the QGIS QT6 status meeting we had yesterday. >> > >> > First I'd like to thank all the attendees, it was great to see the >> > excitement and the interest in moving forward with this project. >> > >> > If I may summarize the outcome, we decided that the best way to move >> > forward is to create a working group with all the interested >> > developers and allocate a budget (20K is the proposed budget) in order >> > to find a solution to the main blockers, it is very hard to estimate >> > the effort in advance but we thought that with that budget we will be >> > able to move forward. >> > >> > Any QGIS core developer with experience in the main areas involved and >> > willing to dedicate some time to this effort is eligible and warmly >> > invited to participate in the working group. >> > >> > Here is the link to the minutes: >> > >> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Un4Jyz9PO8t2vmEBkUKa187SytM2gsQn-jB6mSqXcvU/ >> > >> > This proposal will be discussed at the next PSC meeting. >> >> >> -- >> >> Julien Cabieces >> Senior Developer at Oslandia >> julien.cabie...@oslandia.com >> 09.72.52.52.76 >> _______________________________________________ >> QGIS-PSC mailing list >> qgis-...@lists.osgeo.org >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc -- Julien Cabieces Senior Developer at Oslandia julien.cabie...@oslandia.com 09.72.52.52.76 _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer