On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 at 02:54, Sandro Santilli via QGIS-Developer < qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > > That term "committer", btw, should probably be changed nowadays as > with git it doesnt' make much sense.
+1. Maybe we should go with "review approver" to reflect exactly what this privilege means today... > > > The QGIS organization has a budget for PR queue management (triage) > > and a separate entry for reviews (budget is public > > https://www.qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/governance/finance/index.html) > > , in the past this has been working well while I agree that recently > > PRs have been pending without review for a (too) long time. > > The bugfixing spreadsheet has a column to report reviewer names, > but it looks like I'm the only one filling it at the moment. > You may notice I've also reported reviews from non-committers > ( Laurențiu Nicola, in Cc ). I think everyone is trying to reduce paperwork and that's why that column is unpopulated 😂 Nyall
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
