I like this idea of having it reviewed for a cost! Kind regards Em
Emma Hain — Product Manager/Senior GIS Analyst [email protected] [image: https://north-road.com] *North Road* Cartography • Development • Spatial Analysis ------------------------------ *north-road.com* <http://north-road.com> <https://twitter.com/northroadgeo> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/north-road-studios> <https://www.facebook.com/North-Road-997236690392419/home> QGIS User Conference 2025 <https://uc2025.qgis.org/> 2-3 June, Norrköping, Sweden FOSS4G 2025 <https://2025.foss4g.org/> 17-23 November, Auckland, New Zealand On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 at 17:41, Raymond Nijssen via QGIS-Developer < [email protected]> wrote: > Maybe this can be replaced by something similar, but more reliable and > fair? > > Recently, a customer of mine asked me if there was a list of plugins > that can be trusted. They felt vulnerable having all QGIS users in the > organisation downloading any plugin (= python code) and running it. On > the other hand, QGIS without plugins is pretty useless. > > I was thinking about an option for plugins to get a quality tag, for > example when is has multiple developers reviewing each others code. Or a > certified company reviewing plugin code. Like the certified companies > for education? Or uploading/updating a "trusted plugin" cost 100 euros, > and the one approving the plugin code gets that money? > > All pretty hard to set up I think, but I also understand the need. > > Maybe someone here has a better idea? > > Raymond > > > On 2/14/25 08:23, Alessandro Pasotti via QGIS-Developer wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 1:02 AM Emma Hain via QGIS-Developer <qgis- > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > > > > Hi All > > Lova, the site looks amazing and thanks for all of your work on it. > > > > I am asking on behalf of one of my clients how does a plugin become > > featured? > > > > > > > > Back in the days when the plugin site was designed and the plugins were > > just a couple of dozen it seemed nice to have a way to showcase what we > > (the small QGIS community) thought they were the most amazing, it was an > > editorial choice. > > > > I guess it doesn't make much sense to keep that list nowaday. > > > > -- > > Alessandro Pasotti > > QCooperative: www.qcooperative.net <https://www.qcooperative.net> > > ItOpen: www.itopen.it <http://www.itopen.it> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > QGIS-Developer mailing list > > [email protected] > > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
