Richard Duivenvoorde via QGIS-Developer <[email protected]> writes:
> My personal(!) view for Linux packaging (as Linux user, not packager). > > Stick to 3.40/LTR/Qt5 for QGIS3. > (Well, that is what our Debian packager does, not sure what your users expect) > > One reason to have a Qt6 package available is that you give Plugin devs the > ability to have Qt6 based QGIS so they have update/test their plugins. > > Because I foresee dependency issues (Debian), I'm testing the flatpak route, > so Linux users can install a Qt6 build flatpak next to their Qt5 build for > experiments. > > I'd say: QGIS4 is Qt6-only, but we need to have a Qt6 option (be it 3.40 or > higher) available for (Linux) python devs. Thanks. I have been LTR only, but thinking about moving to following all releases once they hit .1. I do not perceive them as at all unstable. Sounds like I should add a qt5/qt6 option group, mostly the test that the qt6 things are packaged and that it works, and then be prepared to flip it for 4, and later remove it. _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
