Hi all, Then comes the question of the timing. Here would be my proposal:
- 3.40 stays LTR until the 4.0 release (if it sticks to the schedule, it's the regular amount of time) - 3.44 turns LTR when 4.0 is released, until 4.2 becomes LTR (if we stick to the schedule, it's again the regular amount of time) see the modified schedule: PR 3.44.2 3.40.10 2025-08-15 33 4 PR 3.44.3 3.40.11 . 2025-09-12 37 6 PR 3.44.4 3.40.12 2025-10-24 43 4 PR 3.44.5 3.40.13 2025-11-21 47 4 PR 3.44.6 3.40.14 2025-12-19 51 4 PR/FF 3.44.7 3.40.15 3.99 2026-01-16 3 5 LR/PR 4.0.0 3.44.8 2026-02-20 8 4 PR 4.0.1 3.44.9 2026-03-20 12 4 PR 4.0.2 3.44.10 2026-04-17 16 4 PR/FF 4.0.3 3.44.11 4.1 2026-05-15 20 5 LTR/PR 4.2.0 3.44.12 2026-06-19 25 4 PR 4.2.1 3.44.13 2026-07-17 29 4 PR 4.2.2 3.44.14 2026-08-14 33 4 PR/FF 4.2.3 3.44.15 4.3 2026-09-11 37 5 LR/PR 4.4.0 4.2.4 2026-10-16 42 4 PR 4.4.1 4.2.5 2026-11-13 46 4 PR 4.4.2 4.2.6 2026-12-11 50 4 PR/FF 4.4.3 4.2.7 4.5 2027-01-08 2 6 LR/PR 4.6.0 4.2.8 Cheers, Denis Le lun. 8 sept. 2025 à 10:00, Werner Macho via QGIS-Developer < [email protected]> a écrit : > Hi all! > The Idea of making the last 3.x a LTR is a very good one and I think there > is a big benefit if we do so. > > so big +1 from my side too > > regards > Werner > > On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 8:58 AM Andreas Neumann via QGIS-Developer < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Tomorrow is our next PSC meeting. We can discuss it there and then >> announce it somewhere where it is hopefully visible (feed and or blog) - >> along with the information that QGIS 4.0 is postponed to 2026. >> >> I am also +1 to make 3.44 an LTR as the last 3.x version. >> >> Andreas >> >> On Mon, 8 Sept 2025 at 04:15, Mathieu Pellerin via QGIS-Developer < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1, makes a lot of sense Denis. >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 7:41 AM Nyall Dawson via QGIS-PSC < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 4 Sept 2025 at 23:21, Denis Rouzaud via QGIS-PSC >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Dear all, >>>> > >>>> > After the discussion of skipping one release before 4.0, I would like >>>> to suggest to turn 3.44 into a LTR version: >>>> > - this would lower the pressure on the upcoming 4.0 >>>> > - this would make a last 3.x version with all the features a LTR >>>> > - this would avoid the complexity of maintenance over such a long >>>> period of time on 3.40 (in case 4.0 gets more delayed) >>>> > >>>> > No big deal, but I believe this would make things a bit smoother. >>>> >>>> Personally, I'm +1 to this. >>>> >>>> Nyall >>>> >>>> > >>>> > Denis >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > QGIS-PSC mailing list >>>> > [email protected] >>>> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> QGIS-PSC mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> QGIS-Developer mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> -- >> Andreas Neumann >> QGIS.ORG board member (treasurer) >> _______________________________________________ >> QGIS-Developer mailing list >> [email protected] >> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
