Hi Nyall, hi all, For what it's worth, It's okay for me :)
But I would recommend decoupling the submission from the merge deadlines. We've partially done that in the past with the "Freeze exempt" tag, but I would make it a de facto standard to reduce the pressure on reviewers and avoid pressing merges. So anything that is somehow in a ready state in a week should automatically gets 2 more weeks to get merged? Sorry, if this is already the case, but I couldn't find any trace of these rules. A place for a new QEP maybe. Happy New Feature Freeze :) Denis Le jeu. 8 janv. 2026 à 22:21, Nyall Dawson via QGIS-PSC < [email protected]> a écrit : > Hi list, > > I'm wondering if we could possibly push back the feature freeze date > by 1-1.5 weeks for this cycle? > > I've personally got a few features I'd like to squeeze in for 4.0, but > aside from that, we have a huge number of feature PRs still needing > review (or a lot of work). I'm anticipating that many more will be > opened next week too, given the number of feature QEPs we've seen + > features I know others are actively working on for 4.0. > > Thanks for the consideration! > Nyall > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-PSC mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc >
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
