Hi, On Fri, 15 May 2009 11:44:40 +0200 Agustin Lobo <alobolis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The critical point is better for whom? I understand that it's easier > for administration, which is important as time is scarce. But we > should also consider whether it's better for the users: many of them > do not even know what's stable or unstable in this context. > So we should find a balance. For users, in general, simple pages having > the fundamental > material and only the fundamental material are the best. > > Probably a page as suggested by Otto is a good balance. > In particular putting stable before unstable and source is essential. We updated the download area according to your suggestion, set a fix width for the table and will revise it this evening. If you have more ideas to improve the page for users, just tell us. regards, Otto > Thanks for taking care of the site. > > Agus > > > Tim Sutton wrote: > > Hi > > > > Werner Macho wrote: > >> Hi! > >> > >> corrected it - if you find more typos - please report .. > >> > >> Speaking from Unstable and Stable .. well probably we should seperate > >> it - but > >> Source Code IS already on an own page .. > >> > >> I guess it's inside the table to have all things we provide for > >> download in just one page.. > >> > > > > Managing everything in one table is better I think - simplification > > over complication is good :-) In the table you can just type unstable > > into the search box to see just unstable packages. You can also sort > > by columns etc. That should give enough flexibility for those who want > > it. > > > > Thanks for fixing the typo! > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-user mailing list > Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user _______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
