On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 17:42 +0200, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > Andreas Neumann ha scritto: > > I think that this is due to the fact that QGIS is still a relatively young > > project and a lot of functionality is still missing. For this reason > > people trade the benefit of having the urgently needed feature against the > > fact that the unstable version may not be as stable. > > Yes, this is also my experience. Furthermore, I do not find 1.0.x > particularly more stable than 1.1.x (do you?).
Here too. Our practical point of view is that the latest additions (new editing tools, undo/redo, etc.) together with all the bugs that are being solved, is more important than that "unstable" in the splash screen. We would like to see out qgis 1.2 the sooner possible. -- Giovanni -- _______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
