Congratulations!
I proposed the same long ago and got a negative answer:
Tim Sutton wrote:
Hi
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 19:34 +0100, Agustin *Lobo* wrote:
.../...
> BTW, priority "minor: *annoyance* or enhancement"
> should not be split in two different categories? I mean that an
enhancement
> could not be of minor priority, and certainly
> not similar to a minor *annoyance*.
Historically we had many more priority levels but the problem is then
people dont know how to choose between them and the data contained in
that field essentially becomes meaningless. In essence an enhancement or
*annoyance* priority should be used for cases where the functionality of
QGIS isn't critically impaired (e.g. crashing / corrupting data /
showing incorrect results) but could be improved in some way. I believe
that is a good fit for this ticket.
Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Paolo Cavallini ha scritto:
I suggest changing the priority:
minor: annoyance or enhancement
to
minor: annoyance
The current situation is ambiguous: a reporter is lead to think that an
enhancement is to be classified always as minor, even when it's an
important one.
Done - thanks Tim for allowing me to do so.
I would also like to change the component list: the current situation is
sometimes ambiguous. The ideal would be to have a classification system
both user friendly (easy to decide which category the bug belongs to)
and developer friendly (easy to check just the bugs in their respective
areas of interest).
A few possible changes:
- recombine "Plugins" and Python" into "C++ plugins" and "Python plugins"
- combine Translations and Internationalisation
- combine Graphics, Symbology and Marker Symbols
- drop SPIT
- include MapServer export into Python plugins
The current category list is:
Build/Install
Data Provider
Digitising
Documentation and Help
Graphics
GRASS
GUI
Internationalisation
MapCanvas
Map Legend
MapServer export
Marker Symbols
OGR Layer support
Plugins
Printing
Projection Support
Project Loading / Saving
Python
Rasters
SPIT
Symbology
Translations
Vectors
WMS
Comments and other suggestions welcome. It would be great if some
developer would accept to become owner of one or more category.
Furthermore, I'm going to set some more default reports for specific
purposes (eg OSX bugs, etc. - again, suggestions welcome).
All the best.
begin:vcard
fn:Agustin Lobo
n:Lobo;Agustin
org:Institut de Ciencies de la Terra "Jaume Almera" CSIC
adr:;;Lluis Sole Sabris s/n;Barcelona;;08028;Spain
email;internet:agustin.l...@ija.csic.es
url:http://www.ija.csic.es/gt/obster
version:2.1
end:vcard
_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
