Hi Mauricio, I'm not 100% sure what is going on with the precision. I suspect the snapping feature will solve this, as the difference is quite small. I zoomed in to 2:1 (e.g. as far as I could) and clicked as close as I possibly could to a corner vertex, and then when I drew my feature, it doesn't line up (although the difference is minute in terms of actual distance)
I guess I'm still not 100% clear on how the coordinates are entered. What does the 'zenith' column mean? I have a lot of plans that give angles relative to north or south (so they are displayed as Nxxdxx'xx"W or Sxxdxx'xx"E for example). I can convert these to a 360-based azimuth, but it would be nice to be able to enter these without doing any prior conversions. It looks like the zooming issue is fixed now! Thanks for all of your work on this--please let me know if I can provide any further information or testing for you. Cheers, Darren Cope http://dmcope.freeshell.org 2009/11/7 Maurício de Paulo <mauricio....@gmail.com> > Ok, thanks for the ideas. But could explain some of them to me? > What happened with the precision of the starting point? I've made some > tests here and the precision should be ok. I've made a teste with 0,0,0 and > it drew fine. Could you tell me how to reproduce the bug? > The snapping feature is my main priority now. I think this is a great > improvement. > DMS should be second in the list. But actually I need some inputs on how is > best entered a coordinate. We're talking about azimuth here. And a DMS > should have 3 numbers. > Something like 10o14'52'' is possible and easy for the user. Is it ok? > About the much larger extent... Hum... Fixed on zoom to selected feature. I > think that should solve it. > Gratefully > Maurício de Paulo >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
