thank you for your quick reply, victor. if i can give an opinion, I think it's a good idea to include saga because it allows you to have the latest version of the saga certainly compatible with sextante, thus avoiding possible conflicts between versions os sextante and saga itself.
just a question... as i reported in some tickets, there are some problems of saga modules not due to sextante. don't you think it could be better to remove them from sextante, waiting for they are fixed in the saga core? -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/saga-sextante-tp5053663p5053683.html Sent from the Quantum GIS - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
