Hi again Now I´ve tried to make changes - but with no success. I´m not an Icon-designer - This gives two questions: 1: Is it a possibility to keep the old icons in the new download until there a better solution with more unique and readable look. 2: How can I keep the old icons in 1.9 (2.0)
It is a bit "funny" when I ask my students (age from 20 to 45) "What is the figure on save project" - and they don´t know - because floppydiscs was in another computer-age. The Open project is even from an older age-period with cabinet-filing systems. The truncks in database toolbox is even more difficult to understand.... Just a few thoughts from an "old" GIS user Regards Lene Fischer ________________________________________ Fra: qgis-user-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [qgis-user-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] på vegne af Lene Fischer [l...@life.ku.dk] Sendt: 24. maj 2013 14:26 Til: qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org; qgis-develo...@lists.osgeo.org Emne: [Qgis-user] [Qgis-developer] New Icons - difficult to "read" Hi My "complaint" was not for keeping the old symbols, but as suggested - to put colour to the new ones. And to Robert: Thanks for the openminded answer. I´ll try in the weekend to come up with a suggestion. It´s going to be a QGIS weekend - we are also working on the translation into danish language before the new release :-) Regards Lene Fischer Fra: qgis-user-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [qgis-user-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] på vegne af Robert Szczepanek [rob...@szczepanek.pl] Sendt: 24. maj 2013 13:51 Til: Jonathan Moules Cc: qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org; skampus; qgis-develo...@lists.osgeo.org Emne: Re: [Qgis-user] [Qgis-developer] New Icons - difficult to "read" Hi Jonathan, You are right. Problem with new icons is that we have started with some idea (add raster, vector, PostgreSQL layer) and end up with several icons of the same type. First three icons are different, however have too many elements. Next are worse, and Oracle and others wait for more general problem solution. What are the options from my point of view (just layer toolbar)? 1. We could remove green plus leaving the others (yellow star and red minus). This will give some more space to increase symbol size. 2. Remove 'layer' symbol, but in this case 'create vector layer' will be identical to 'create vector' in edit toolbar. But considering toolbar context is could be OK. Definitely we should remove 'layer' from WMS, WFS and similar. 3. Due to variety of database formats replace them with clones of database logo. All changes are possible, but after general agreement. We can do it now or after QGIS 2.0 release. regards, Robert On 24.05.2013 10:59, Jonathan Moules wrote: > +1 > > i.e. The difference between the "Add PostGIS layers" and "Add SpatiaLite > layers" is that one has a regular cylinder and the other has a > fat-waisted hour-glass cylinder - about 20-30 pixels are different in an > icon that's got 1024 pixels! I have to look at them in detail to see the > differences. And there's still MSSQL and Oracle icons to be created in > the new schema which using this system will only confuse things more. > > > Don't get me wrong, I like the style of the new icons, but they're > really hard to visually differentiate. > > > I did a quick google and came across this: > http://turbomilk.com/blog/cookbook/icon_design/10_mistakes_in_icon_design/ > > The QGIS icons do all of the top three things. > > Jonathan > > > > > > On 24 May 2013 09:27, skampus <stefano.cam...@regione.piemonte.it > <mailto:stefano.cam...@regione.piemonte.it>> wrote: > > that could be a useful option. > sincerely, from my point of view, many icons are > unreadable/undistinguishable so i click them correctly only because > now i > remberer relative position > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > > http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Re-Qgis-user-New-Icons-difficult-to-read-tp5055427p5055467.html > Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > qgis-develo...@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:qgis-develo...@lists.osgeo.org> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > > > This transmission is intended for the named addressee(s) only and may > contain sensitive or protectively marked material up to RESTRICTED and > should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or > authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, > or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in > error please notify the sender immediately. All email traffic sent to or > from us, including without limitation all GCSX traffic, may be subject > to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. > > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > qgis-develo...@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > _______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user _______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user _______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
