Hi, I was reading the graphs (I do not understand german, sorry) of the slides from Sourcepole about their banchmarks [1]. I was surprised to see how QGIS Server outperforms UMN Mapserver, because my experience was different. I haven't done comparisons in the last months. In the past performances didn't appear better then Mapserver.
Marco (and the ohters from Sourcepole), could you share the configurations adopted for the benchmark? Hardware, http server configuration, caching, tiling, etc.? Something is written inside the PDF, but Google Translator isn't doing a great work :( Thanks a lot, Giovanni [1] http://sourcepole.ch/assets/2013/6/17/fossgis_2013_performanceoptimierte_wms_dienste.pdf -- Giovanni Allegri http://about.me/giovanniallegri blog: http://blog.spaziogis.it GEO+ geomatica in Italia http://bit.ly/GEOplus
_______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
