Hi Richard, I didn't want to throw away all that was done, I'm sorry if it sounded like that. I reopened the ticket because a few people (including me) disagreed with the change, and did not take part in the initial discussion.
I understand too many options are not a good thing, on the other hand choice is good when it's not too confusing and easy to implement. cheers, Etienne On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Richard Duivenvoorde <rdmaili...@duif.net>wrote: > Hi Etienne, > > I'm fine with the solution of Jef: make it an option (now that it is done). > > But in general: I do not like the fact that we had, I think, a > discussion of about 2 weeks with several people, which is thrown out of > the window because one reopens an issue and makes some noise. Apparently > the time we/I put into this discussion was not worth my time. > > Besides this: I do not think having an option for everything is the best > option ;-) > > Better to have a sensible default, have a discussion/voting and then > deal with that. An extra setting I see as a bad compromise here. The > Settings dialogs are getting more and more crowded with options I do > really not know anymore for which minimal detail it is giving me options > for. > > Please let us create some (ui/hud) vision and hold on to that, so we are > not driving on user comments only. > > Regards, > > Richard Duivenvoorde > > > On 25-02-14 18:24, Etienne Tourigny wrote: > > I find it rather annoying also, and re-opened the bug. > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Jonathan Moules > > <jonathanmou...@warwickshire.gov.uk > > <mailto:jonathanmou...@warwickshire.gov.uk>> wrote: > > > > Hi Jürgen, > > Thanks for the link. > > > > From attempting to read that: > > > > - There's no way to turn it off. :-( > > - Shortcuts must be used instead. :-( > > - Delete or Backspace should delete a layer without asking for > > confirmation. > > > > Is this correct? > > > > Because if so, neither Delete nor Backspace works - they don't do > > anything at all. Am I doing something wrong? > > > > (Ctrl-D works - but that brings up the dialog... :-S ) > > > > Did I miss something or is this a bug? > > Best, > > Jonathan > > > > > > On 25 February 2014 16:34, Jürgen E. <j...@norbit.de > > <mailto:j...@norbit.de>> wrote: > > > > Hi Jonathan, > > > > On Tue, 25. Feb 2014 at 16:23:07 +0000, Jonathan Moules wrote: > > > QGIS 2.2 has a confirmation dialog when I go to remove a > > layer; Maybe > > > it's me but I'm sure the previous versions didn't - > > alternately I can't > > > find a setting anywhere to turn this behaviour off (I'm > > assuming I did in > > > the past if it was there). > > > > > > Is this a new feature or have I just lost the setting? > > Personally I find it > > > quite annoying so would like to disable it. > > > > See #9094[1] > > > > > > Jürgen > > > > > > [1] http://hub.qgis.org/issues/9094 > > > > -- > > Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel. > > +49-4931-918175-31 > > Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13 Fax. > > +49-4931-918175-50 > > Software Engineer D-26506 Norden > > http://www.norbit.de > > QGIS PSC member (RM) Germany IRC: jef > > on FreeNode > > > > -- > > norBIT Gesellschaft fuer Unternehmensberatung und > > Informationssysteme mbH > > Rheinstrasse 13, 26506 Norden > > GF: Jelto Buurman, HR: Amtsgericht Emden, HRB 5502 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Qgis-user mailing list > > Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org> > > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user > > > > > > > > This transmission is intended for the named addressee(s) only and > > may contain sensitive or protectively marked material up to > > RESTRICTED and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the > > named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you > > may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have > > received this transmission in error please notify the sender > > immediately. All email traffic sent to or from us, including without > > limitation all GCSX traffic, may be subject to recording and/or > > monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Qgis-user mailing list > > Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org> > > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Qgis-user mailing list > > Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org > > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user > > > >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user