Hi,
On 2015-11-12 10:22, Anita Graser wrote: > On Nov 12, 2015 9:11 AM, "Neumann, Andreas" <a.neum...@carto.net> wrote: >> >> I also think that - what Anita wants - is a special case of a cluster >> renderer (one that actually does not cluster, but only count how many >> features are at the same geometry). To have this as a special option of the >> displacement renderer would be a quite misleading ... >> >> But the cluster renderer also allows for a search radius (similar to the >> heatmap) - while the displacement renderer only looks at features at the >> exact same location (I know there is now a tolerance, but this was only >> added later). > > Exactly this tolerance makes the renderer much more interesting to me. Never > had a use case for the original displacement renderer. but still we shouldn't misuse terms. Displacement is the opposite of clustering. What you want is clustering, not displacement. Andreas
_______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
