Hi Andreas, On Wed, 20. Jan 2016 at 09:04:52 +0100, Neumann, Andreas wrote: > I also remember that Marco Hugentobler (Sourcepole) was contracted to > fix these Shapefile issues for the province of Vorarlberg - though I may > be wrong. So there is already someone investing to fix this bug. Marco - > correct me if I am wrong.
Yes, please. I thought this was a fact - and didn't look at all into the problem. Not sure if QGIS always does a REPACK (it used to after each delete - but that changes feature ids and interferes with internal stuff). I'm also not sure that GDAL 2 fixes the problem - the comments to the ticket are not conclusive in that regard (GRASS is probably not a good test as it also uses GDAL and hence also should follow it's interpretation of what's deleted; see also https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/2016-January/043483.html). Jürgen PS: @Saber may your GDAL 2.0.0dev come from experiments with this? OSGeo4W has 1.11.3 (or 2.0.0 as experimental - which QGIS doesn't use - but no *dev). -- Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel. +49-4931-918175-31 Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13 Fax. +49-4931-918175-50 Software Engineer D-26506 Norden http://www.norbit.de QGIS release manager (PSC) Germany IRC: jef on FreeNode
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
