Hello,
On 02/06/2016 00:38, Daniel Vicente Lühr Sierra wrote: [...] > Now, for the choice of a web-client I have found two alternatives which > apparently work with QGIS server "in mind" (make use of its extensions, > like print composer, etc.): > * QGIS web client. > * Lizmap web client. There is also GIS.Lab which is mainly based on Django and Angular : https://github.com/gislab-npo/gislab-web Vincent > > First, I would like to know if any or both projects are "officially" > active (I understand by the timestamps in github that both are, but > Lizmap looks more "lively"). Also, I read somewhere in the list about a > QGIS webclient "Mk. II" being worked on. > > Second, I would like to know if QGIS-webclient has support for WFS > layers, or if it is easy to implement (OpenLayers should be able to > handle WFS, but I don't know if that functionality has been implemented > in the webclient). > > Finaly, just by reading the documentation (I haven't tested Lizmap, > yet), it looks like Lizmap has more features (and more modern) than QGIS > web client, like a workaround to include the base layer in a printed > copy of the map, WFS-"ready", links to media files, portable > devices-friendly, embedded user access control, animation support for > temporal vector layers, and others, at the expense of a slighltly more > complex way of generating the up of and FTP server) project output > (requires the use of a > plugin and optionally the set). > I would like to read opinions of anyone who has tried both clients and > had a chance to compare them. > > Any insight in these matters is highly appreciated. > > Thanks > _______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
