Hey Tyler, 2.14 is the next LTR once 2.16 is release, which is in the next month or so. I would generally say unless you see a reason to not you should move to 2.14.
If you have done testing and are happy to move no harm in the upgrade. - Nathan On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Tyler Veinot <tylerkvei...@gmail.com> wrote: > I just rolled back my QGIS to 2.8 from 2.14.2 not long ago because I am > using it in a production environment, sort of, and plan on pushing it out > to users more and more. However I noticed some things about 2.8 that are > either; different, missing, or just harder to do than with 2.14 and I am > wondering if using 2.8 is really necessary. > As the GIS Tech for our department I use it to subsidize my Arc Desktop > Basic tools and map production. Everyone else uses it as a GIS data viewer. > My plan is to move us to more open source products and build/develop our > own services. > Anyway, I really liked 2.14 over 2.8 and just wanted some input on if it > is wise to use the Short Term Release over the Long Term Release. Does > anyone know when the next Long Term Release is likely to come out? > Thanks > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-user mailing list > Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user