Am Di, 21.03.2017, 21:23 schrieb johnrobot: > I´m not convinced that having all these duplicates is a good thing. Do we > really need 13 buffering tools? Why not try to minimize this? Having > multiple tools for the same task only makes it harder for users and > developers. Does QGIS have to expose all of the tools just because it is > possible?
You can disable SAGA, GRASS and others in processing options. I really like the possibility to switch between different tools. QGIS' dissolve tool is weak in comparism to GRASS' one. The one in GRASS supports snapping, which fixes wholes like a charm etc. > Magnus Btw, who's John Robot? Please try to use your real name. Others might name you a troll ;) _______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
