Gents, i am not an expert in GIS and more or less a „learning by doing“ user with working with the background functions by using PyQGIS (as i learned how it is typically named if we use the QGIS classes within python).
However: We may never forget it is a „free community“ without any commercial aspects and all the typically staff behind. If somebody insist and insits of his right to claim we shall buy commercial software, pay for and then he can expect and insists on all the R&D and QS staff. As long as we may use it more or less for free, we shall be glad to have - even there is a bothering bug. and if yes make a workaround, downgrade or whatever else. sorry but all this claiming is boring and hard to accept to the QGIS team: well done and fantastic job pat On 26. Mai 2017, 14:21 +0200, Jürgen E. Fischer <j...@norbit.de>, wrote: > Hi Tobias, > > On Fri, 26. May 2017 at 14:14:33 +0200, Tobias Wendorff wrote: > > I think, we've talked about this some week ago. QGIS really needs > > a test suite, which checks all the core functions automatically :( > > Yes. And some people need to learn how to rub people the right way. > > > Jürgen > > -- > Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel. +49-4931-918175-31 > Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13 Fax. +49-4931-918175-50 > Software Engineer D-26506 Norden http://www.norbit.de > QGIS release manager (PSC) Germany IRC: jef on FreeNode > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-user mailing list > Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
_______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
