Hi Nicolas, Yann. Please remember, if the issue is confirmed, to open a ticket on https://issues.qgis.org/ Thanks.
On 23/03/19 06:52, Nicolas Cadieux wrote: > Salut Yann, > > In QGIS, try renaming the output file instead of using the default > temporary file. I have had similar problems in the past but I am not > sure if this is the same thing. You can try saving as a tif or as > .sdat. I had funny results in the past with SAGA when using tif as > output therefore I had more success saving in SAGA .sdat and then > exporting that result to a tif afterwards. > > Nice to know you got it working. SAGA is nice and has rich algorithm > but has the nasty habit of loading massive amounts of data to memory. > This makes it faster if you can take the memory hit. > > Au plaisir! > Nicolas > > > Le 22 mars 2019 à 22:45, Yann Troutet <ytrou...@selkirk.ca > <mailto:ytrou...@selkirk.ca>> a écrit : > >> Merci Nicolas, >> >> I had tried the Vigra Smoothing tool from SAGA, but this simply raises >> the following error message: >> >> The following layers were not correctly >> generated.<ul><li>C:/Users/ytroutet/AppData/Local/Temp/processing_f62d6fcc634e4d53945b3b999d33eb65/fabcc06c819f4f7684ec3ba0a75d6a0d/OUTPUT.sdat</li></ul>You >> can check the 'Log Messages Panel' in QGIS main window to find more >> information about the execution of the algorithm. >> >> I'm using QGIS 3.4.4. Madeira and have mostly been attempting to run >> r.resamp.filter kernel filters. This process just outputs a new raster >> layer with the same pixels values, even though I've tried different >> 'radius' values. >> >> I've just looked at the SAGA simple filter, and this worked just fine. >> >> Une fois de plus merci de m'avoir suggéré les options du côté de SAGA. >> >> yann >> >>> Nicolas Cadieux <nicolas.cadi...@archeotec.ca >> >>> <mailto:nicolas.cadi...@archeotec.ca>> >> 3/22/2019 6:26 PM >>> >> Hi, >> >> That is weird. There are low pass filter in processing. Try one from >> Saga. Then open Saga and try again. Compare both. If you get the >> same results, you will know the problem is from Saga or the raster but >> not from QGIS. Then write back with the exact version of QGIS you are >> using, on what platform (OS, Linux, Windows...) and what algorithm you >> are trying. This should help us figure things out. >> >> Nicolas >> >> Le 22 mars 2019 à 20:27, Yann Troutet <ytrou...@selkirk.ca >> <mailto:ytrou...@selkirk.ca>> a écrit : >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Are there any raster smoothing (low-pass filtering) tools that will >>> work in QGIS 3. Every option that I try simply outputs a raster that >>> has the exact same values as the original. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by >>> *Selkirk College-E.F.A. Project*, and is believed to be clean. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Qgis-user mailing list >>> Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org> >>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user >>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-user mailing list > Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user > -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS.ORG Chair: http://planet.qgis.org/planet/user/28/tag/qgis%20board/ _______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user