What a shame, I totally ignored the grass tools ^^’

Thanks at all for your fast responses. I will try it out during the next days. 

Christoph 

> Am 01.08.2019 um 17:35 schrieb Carolina Boccato <cbocc...@gmail.com>:
> 
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> Yes, there is this implementation!
> 
> In the processing toolbox at the Grass provider you will find v.generalize. 
> This one has several algorithms, one of them is chaikins.
> 
> Sincerely, 
> Carolina 
> 
> 
>> On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 10:18, Stefan Giese <stefan.gi...@wheregroup.com> 
>> wrote:
>> Hi Christoph,
>> 
>> under processing tools you will find 2 vector smooth tools, one is native 
>> QGIS, the other comes from SAGA 
>> (http://www.saga-gis.org/saga_tool_doc/2.2.2/shapes_lines_7.html). Just type 
>> "smooth" into the filter of the processing tools.
>> 
>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>> Stefan Giese
>> Projektleiter/Consultant
>> ******************************************************
>> Kompaktkurs Aufbau einer GDI mit Open-Source-Software
>> FOSS Academy Sommerschule: 23. bis 27.09.2019
>> https://www.foss-academy.com/kompaktkurse.html
>> ******************************************************
>> WhereGroup GmbH
>> Eifelstraße 7
>> 53119 Bonn
>> Germany
>> 
>> Fon: +49 (0)228 / 90 90 38 - 61
>> Fax: +49 (0)228 / 90 90 38 - 11
>> 
>> stefan.gi...@wheregroup.com
>> www.wheregroup.com
>> Geschäftsführer:
>> Olaf Knopp, Peter Stamm 
>> Amtsgericht Bonn, HRB 9885
>>> Am 01.08.2019 um 15:09 schrieb Christoph Jung:
>>> Hello everybody,
>>> 
>>> Does QGIS has a similar smoothing function like ArcGIS described in the 
>>> following webpage?
>>> https://desktop.arcgis.com/de/arcmap/10.3/tools/cartography-toolbox/smooth-polygon.htm
>>> 
>>> I think I saw something like the result of the PAEK algorithm in QGIS, but 
>>> I cannot remember when and where ^^
>>> 
>>> Does an implementation of the chaikins algorithm exists in any tool, that 
>>> can be integrated into the toolbox?
>>> 
>>> I tried out the Smooth processing directly in QGIS and the plugin 
>>> cartographic line generalisation. But both are too close orientated on the 
>>> original geometry for me. I am searching for the possibility to create a 
>>> more abstract copy of a polygon. Maybe somebody has some ideas about it. 
>>> 
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Christoph 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Qgis-user mailing list
>>> Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
>>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-user mailing list
>> Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Reply via email to