Dear Alexander, Thank you for looking into it. As I said, there is no projection on the fly, my layer and the file are in EPSG:6670, as is the project.
I will try with a selection from the large layer today!. Best, Maria > Am 14.05.2020 um 23:15 schrieb Alexandre Neto <senhor.n...@gmail.com>: > > If the project is in one CRS, and the layer is in another, then the raster is > transformed on-the-fly for sure. > > Give it a try. > > A quinta, 14/05/2020, 08:47, Priv.-Doz. Dr. Maria Shinoto > <maria.shin...@zaw.uni-heidelberg.de> escreveu: > Hi, > > > So the problem occurs only when creating a Hillshade, from a DEM, using the > > hillshade symbology? > > well, I did not try hillshade in any other case yet, so, yes. > > > Have you chosen the correct a factor value? > > What is that? Perhaps there is something I miss? > > > Try to use the same projection in the project and in the layer so that you > > have no reprojection going on. > > The project is set to EPSG:6670, and the Raster layer is not projected on the > fly, but from a file that is in EPSG:6670. So I think, reprojection is not > the problem here. > > Thanks for checking this up, if you have an explanation about the factor > value, that might help. > > Best, > Maria Shinoto > > > > > Nicolas Cadieux > > Ça va bien aller! > > > >> Le 13 mai 2020 à 04:31, Priv.-Doz. Dr. Maria Shinoto > >> <maria.shin...@zaw.uni-heidelberg.de> a écrit : > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Today I tried making a hillshade from the raster data you helped me out > >> today -- after filling empty pixels, everything looks great. > >> > >> Now, when trying to set the layer symbology to hillshade, I got artifacts > >> with the default setting and the recommend bilinear with medium. Looking > >> for a solution, I found this conservation about the same issue (I think) > >> from about 3 years ago; it seems to be a problem still today (working with > >> QGIS 3.12). > >> > >> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/23859 > >> > >> So I tried the hillshade tool from GDAL in the Processing toolbox with > >> identical setting, and everything looks great. > >> > >> I think that the flawed hillshade in the easily accessible Symbology > >> dialogue needs some work or a hint to the GDAL tool in the Processing > >> toolbox. It is frustrating for someone who is new. > >> > >> I add screenshots from the bad results in the Properties > Symbology > >> dialogue and the raster image from which I started. > >> > >> Anyway, it was great to have a solution easily at hand ;-) > >> > >> Best, > >> Maria > >> > >> > >> <Bildschirmfoto 2020-05-13 um 13.58.59.jpeg> > >> > >> <Bildschirmfoto 2020-05-13 um 14.08.53.jpeg> > >> > >> <Bildschirmfoto 2020-05-13 um 13.59.30.jpeg> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Qgis-user mailing list > >> Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org > >> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user > >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-user mailing list > Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user _______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
