My note on this is that, us it really an issue to keep them on the repo,
other than general housekeeping? If it's due to file storage size,
perhaps there's a case for it, however to remove them without at least
archiving them, would possibly create potential issues down the line. I
have many projects that are 10+ years old and I keep a version of 2.x
running simply to allow myself to be able to load them without concern
for loss. I'm an age where data storage is inexpensive and data plugins
take much time, no matter how historical, I think keeping them is the
better alternative.
---
Regards,
Nigel Berjak
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
On 2024-01-26 19:41, Andrea Giudiceandrea via QGIS-User wrote:
Greg Troxel gdt at lexort.com
Fri Jan 26 07:21:47 PST 2024
It will be interesting to see if anyone says they are using qgis 2.
Looking at the number of plugins downloads, it seems there are still
users using QGIS 2. For example, today the number of downloads of the
"Shape Tools" plugin version 0.7.12 for QGIS 2 is 14736 [1], while it
was 14168 one years ago [2]
Best regards.
Andrea
[1] https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/shapetools/#plugin-versions
[2]
https://web.archive.org/web/20230212152411/https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/shapetools/#plugin-versions
_______________________________________________
QGIS-User mailing list
QGIS-User@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
_______________________________________________
QGIS-User mailing list
QGIS-User@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
