Hi We are going to be hopefully moving various qgis facilities onto different servers in the near future so I would prefer to do this afterwards, though I support the idea of closing aging bugs. The people I rent the server from auto close issues after 48 hours if waiting response from the reporter - wouldnt that be (unreaslistically) nice :-)
Regards Tim 2008/1/31, Magnus Homann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Paolo Cavallini wrote: > > Hi all. > > I had a look to the bug list, and I think many of them are no longer > > valid. I would urge all those who reported a bug to check whether it is > > still valid, and if not, to close them. > > This is important, both for users (who do not get lost in a swamp of > > would-be bugs) and for developers, who can concentrate on the real ones. > > Having >200 open bugs is no good for anyone. > > Please make a little effort. > > I re-state my wish for auto-using bugs where we are waiting for user to > report back for some length of time. I hope Tim can find the time to > implement the server-side logic? > > Magnus > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-user mailing list > Qgis-user@lists.qgis.org > http://lists.qgis.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user > -- Tim Sutton QGIS Project Steering Committee Member - Release Manager Visit http://qgis.org for a great open source GIS openModeller Desktop Developer Visit http://openModeller.sf.net for a great open source ecological niche modelling tool Home Page: http://tim.linfiniti.com Skype: timlinux Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net _______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.qgis.org http://lists.qgis.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
