On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But the actual request can also be formulated; > > Can IDEA users separate the IDEA files from the main commit, and mark any > IDEA > file commit as "IDEA files"?? > > I have tried to do that in the past at OPS4J's various projects, because > the > Idea:Eclipse ratio is not infinite. Would that be satisfactory initial > change? That would be fine. I don't really care if they're their or not, they just seem to clutter up a lot of the commit messages and make it hard to tell what was actually changed. > > > I could also tempt Richard to start using IDEA. As a OPS4J/Qi4j committer, > you > get a license for IDEA free of charge... Warning; After learning it, you > don't want to go back... ;-) Nuf' said. We have a site license for IDEA at work and most people use it. I tried using it for a while and the key bindings were too confusing and I just couldn't retrain my muscle memory quickly enough to be productive. The people on my team also have enough problems with it that I'm pretty leary of switching anyways. Eclipse does everything I need it to and it does it well enough that I don't find myself wondering what the devs were thinking when they write it that I feel inclined to switch. And to be fair I really have nothing against IDEA, I would be making this request whether I was an IDEA user or not. And if someone were to commit Eclipse project files and they were cluttering up commits then I'd make the same request about them. Thanks for making the effort, Rich > > > > Cheers > -- > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > > I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er > I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc > I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug > > _______________________________________________ > qi4j-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev >
_______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
