Yes but none of the emulate the higher instructions!! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Malcolm Cadman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 6:42 PM Subject: Re: [ql-users] QXL: SMSQ
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roy wood > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David > >Tubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >>But it is something that I have to be able to do when required. > >> > >>Progress with wxqt2 is limited, got it up to run, including binding > >>the help pages, sadly it seems to keel over on creating or accessing a > >>QXL.WIN file. > >> > >>My bodge thought above looks the most promising, worked on a small > >>scale trial. > >> > >>Mouse activation not yet achieved, tho' it is present in DOS. > >> > >>Hey Ho, the struggle continues > >To be honest here QPC2 makes so much more sense. I don't know who said > >time is money (watchmakers probably) but you can achieve all you want > >with QPC2 without any other programs being needed. > > Yes, the simple beauty of a software solution over a hardware solution. > > Another advantage is the ease of having an emulator of several machines. > > -- > Malcolm Cadman > _______________________________________________ > QL-Users Mailing List > http://www.quanta.org.uk/mailing.htm _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.quanta.org.uk/mailing.htm
