John Sadler wrote:-
>Copyright was introduced so that the author could get a reasonable
>recompense for his/hers efforts.
>Of course when the lawyers have finished it all becomes unreasonable!
>However that does not change the moral ideas behind copyright.
>It seems totally unreasonable to me that people should be denighed the use
>of an item because the authors have lost interest or just want to be to be
>awkward.
>Perhaps a little application of moral copyright would be the solution
>provided of course there is no commercial benefit to anyone else besides
the
>author(s).
Well, I wouldnt really agree with this, although I don't see the point of
certain authors being awkward either. Having said that, should an author
not want his work distributed, then thats that - it is his after all.
Moral copyright is all very well, until someone gets their solicitor onto
you..... Just because you're giving it away for free doesnt make it right.
Cheers,
Darren.
********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please
notify us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete this E-mail
from your system. Thank you.
It is possible for data transmitted by email to be deliberately or
accidentally corrupted or intercepted. For this reason, where the
communication is by email, the Bank of Ireland Group does not accept
any responsibility for any breach of confidence which may arise
through the use of this medium.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of known computer viruses.
********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.quanta.org.uk/mailing.htm
