Rich Mellor wrote: > I prefer this type of approach as it would ensure that the home > directory (or whatever) would be removed together with the job.
If the job "uses" the thing, the thing is informed when the job dies. Even if not, one could allocate the necessary memory on behalf of the job and therefore it would get freed along with the job. So far I think I'd prefer that over any stack hack, but I haven't completely made up my mind yet. Marcel _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
