Marcel Kilgus writes:
> Ralf Reköndt wrote:
> > spoolon "NUL"
> > spooloff
>
> This will create a file called "NUL_lis". I know because my original
> idea was just to say 'spoolon "par1"' before printing and spooloff
> afterwards, but that created a file "par1_lis".
>
> But the documentation states that you do not have to issue a spoolon
> command before issuing a spooloff command, and, it looks like just
> having the spooloff actually works.
That should be
spoolon '_nul': spooloff
or
spoolon '_par': spooloff
Per
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
