Marcel Kilgus writes: > Ralf Reköndt wrote: > > spoolon "NUL" > > spooloff > > This will create a file called "NUL_lis". I know because my original > idea was just to say 'spoolon "par1"' before printing and spooloff > afterwards, but that created a file "par1_lis". > > But the documentation states that you do not have to issue a spoolon > command before issuing a spooloff command, and, it looks like just > having the spooloff actually works.
That should be spoolon '_nul': spooloff or spoolon '_par': spooloff Per _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm