Oh no! sorry Phoebus I've gone and spelt your name wrong sorry sorry sorry :-( Jon.
The Dents schrieb: > Doug L. wrote: > > <\snip> > >> I would be interested in taking a look at whether any of the current >> near-Net able packages come close to getting a moderately enhanced QL on the >> Net. As I remember, SoQL is one and may get further work so as to come >> closer to being truly Net-enabled. But it's my understanding it still >> requires Aurora (and a recent SMSQ, but I may be able to get/afford SMSQ). >> >> If there's a good possibility of doing something, e.g. programming/coding, >> that would enable a QL black box that's within shouting distance of original >> to get on the net, I'd be interested, though like so many folk on this list >> I don't have limitless spare time. I don't really know enough right now to >> know whether there's even a respectable chance of fitting things into 4MB >> (and maybe just floppies, though HDD might be easier for me & my situation >> than I realize. Not entirely in the spirit, but possibly one can tolerate it >> :-). I don't really know _what_ those things are. >> >> >> > Hi Doug, > I could send you the soQL package. It may not be vapourware but I'm > afraid it dose seem to have become "frozenware" but it should > work on a fairly basic QL. Let me know if you want me to mail it to you. > I would recommend taking a look at Poebus's article series from > QL-Today > Jon. > _______________________________________________ > QL-Users Mailing List > http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm > > _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
