>>> hitchies wrote: >>> >>>> Jim - bad luck; and you are not on my lists. :-) >>>> >>>> Tony: Re - "Best way to check is to Google for your literal email >>>> address" >>>> Go on. Tell the uninatiated (like me). Please. ;-) I am not sure what you mean. I just type my email address in, literally, into a Google search box. What did you think I meant? It used to find dozens - but there is only one now. >>>>
>>>> >>> I receive a large amount of spam at my primary ntlworld address >>> (>150/day) - the spam started before I'd even used the address, so I >>> suspect that ntl sell their lists of primary addresses. I've since >>> decided to make it my sacrificial spam address, and use it exclusively >>> for signing onto sites that require a registration email address. I'm >>> not sure how useful Tony's advice is - a google search fails to find >>> anything on the web with that particular address. Very useful if that is the source (8-)# Not in your case it seems. I often wonder who are the fools who respond to spam. If no-one ever got results, then the number would reduce. Loads must need \/1agra (8-)# It is the Nigerian scam (in caps) and copiers that amazes me. The police took it seriously when someone went to Nigeria to sort it out with the perpetrators, and was shot dead. Tony _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
