Well why not... At the moment, I just thinking to dig in that way using QPC2. But if I had to fix priority I will prefer to find correct mass storage drivers to deal with QXL WIN Files.
Jimmy. -----Message d'origine----- De : ql-users-boun...@lists.q-v-d.com [mailto:ql-users-boun...@lists.q-v-d.com] De la part de Mark Martin Envoyé : vendredi 11 février 2011 16:46 À : ql-us...@q-v-d.com Objet : Re: [Ql-Users] Back on the list... On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:27 AM, QL2K <q...@jadiam.com> wrote: > Hi Tobias, > > Yes I got it on : http://www.kilgus.net/qpc/socket_toc.html > But too Marcel says "that most of TCP functionality useable from SBasic. Full functionality with SBasic and some available toolkits." > > I'm searching about theses toolkits to give a try using S*Basic. Are you thinking about adding TCP/IP support to QL2K? I'm preparing to dig my QXL PC back out, but while I'm doing that, it's important to me to get an emulator up and running that has IP support. The other emulators are a bit overpriced for me, so I'm excited to think you might attempt integrating IP into QL2K. It's either that or I see about getting uQLX rebuilt on a recent Linux kernel. _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
