On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 09:34:50AM -0500, ZN wrote: > On 3/24/01 at 2:13 PM Richard Zidlicky wrote: > > >> Well, I was told that code and data accesses should actually ignore > >> the top three bits (29, 30, 31). In other words, any combination of > >> bits 29, 30, 31, should effectively act as if those bits are 000. > > > >depends on the degree of compatibility you are trying to achieve, > >for some software everything above 16 MB must be wrapped down. > >You can play with UQLX and Minerva to see the effects. > >A programmable MMU helps of course. > > OK, any examples of software that needs 16Mb wrapping (or 32, 64, 128, > 256)? it is pretty long I have done the experiments and I have stopped after findning that not even PE worked. No idea what else would not work. Bye Richard
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems problems P Witte
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems problems Richard Zidlicky
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems problems Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems prob... Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems problems ZN
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems prob... Marcel Kilgus
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems problems Wolfgang Lenerz
- [ql-users] unsubscribe henk verbeek
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems problems Richard Zidlicky
- Re: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems problems ZN
- RE: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems prob... Richard Zidlicky
- RE: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems problems Norman Dunbar
- RE: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems problems Norman Dunbar
- RE: [ql-users] Qliberator & SMSQ - problems problems Norman Dunbar