On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 09:34:50AM -0500, ZN wrote:
> On 3/24/01 at 2:13 PM Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> 
> >> Well, I was told that code and data accesses should actually ignore
> >> the top three bits (29, 30, 31). In other words, any combination of
> >> bits 29, 30, 31, should effectively act as if those bits are 000.
> >
> >depends on the degree of compatibility you are trying to achieve, 
> >for some software everything above 16 MB must be wrapped down.
> >You can play with UQLX and Minerva to see the effects.
> >A programmable MMU helps of course.
> 
> OK, any examples of software that needs 16Mb wrapping (or 32, 64, 128,
> 256)?

it is pretty long I have done the experiments and I have stopped after
findning that not even PE worked. No idea what else would not work.

Bye
Richard

Reply via email to