> >Hmmmm now that's ODD! >I used the following little program to run a "benchmark" of Turbo of sorts > >10 CLS >20 PRINT #2, date$ >30 FOR F=1 to 1000 >40 PRINT #1, SQRT(F) >50 END FOR F >60 PRINT #2, date$ >70 PAUSE Ooops make the 1000 10000 >On QPC 2v2 FINAL, SBASIC reports execution in 9 secs. > >When I execute the compiled same program I get 10 secs! > > >Is it possible? > >Phoebus Anyways after changing line 30 to 100000 and then 40 to read SQRT (F), ATAN(F) then I got a little better results: SBASIC did it in 2 mins 31 secs and TURBO in 2 mins 21 secs. Still though it's only 7% faster .... hmmmm Phoebus
- TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 release) Thierry Godefroy
- Re: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 ... Phoebus Dokos
- Re: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New Q... Thierry Godefroy
- Re: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 ... Phoebus Dokos
- Re: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 ... Phoebus Dokos
- RE: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 ... Claude Mourier 00
- Re: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 ... Phoebus Dokos
- Re: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New Q... Thierry Godefroy
- RE: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 ... Phoebus Dokos
- Re: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New Q... Marcel Kilgus
- RE: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 ... Claude Mourier 00
- RE: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New Q... Phoebus Dokos
- RE: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 ... Claude Mourier 00
- RE: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 ... Claude Mourier 00
- Re: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 ... Jerome Grimbert
- RE: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 ... Claude Mourier 00
- Re: TURBO and SMSQ/E (was: Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 ... Wolfgang Lenerz