>} That is a good point ... about the ROM based OS.
>I like ROM based OS.
>OS should be stable. and Rom based provided a virus-free quick install !

A ROM based OS is ok, but it's always nice to have an option to
use a newer version or a different OS.

>May I say "kernel version 2.0.x, 2.2.k, 2.4.z... " who know when it will stop.
>Perfection should be done right the very first time!

This is the reason everyone uses a QL these days, isn't it?

>(I do not even speak of 2.1.139 !)

Wasn't 1.2.129 the last of the 2.1.x series?  I still remember
fondly 2.1.106-ac4...

Regards, Robert

Reply via email to