> > Is the 68040 FPU in the Q40 never used except in 
> > assembler or C applications?

> Yes.

Blimey.  :O)

I guess the same applies to QDOS Classic as well then.

But expedient I suppose because the alternative would be to either 
maintain two OS source code branches for non-FPU and FPU-equipped 
platforms, or use more ROM space with two sets of FP routines to be 
selected according to hardware detected at boot.  (And I also believe, 
from a ql-users thread from a while back, that there would be the 
portability issue caused by the difference between QL-format and 
Motorola format variables.)

Ian.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgraf 
> Sent: 31 October 2001 20:35
> To: ql-users
> Cc: pgraf
> Subject: Re: [ql-users] Floating Point confusion
> 
> 
> Hi Ian,
> 
> >Reading Peter Graf's article 'Different Viewpoints' in QL Today, has 
> >left me confused about the use of 68k FP instructions.  
> Commenting on 
> >the Test909-Math benchmark, Peter points out that there is Intel FP 
> >code in SMSQ/E for QPC but none for 68k hardware.  Is this true of 
> >SBASIC as well? Is the 68040 FPU in the Q40 never used except in 
> >assembler or C applications?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> >Or other machine code producing compiled languages. :)
> 
> :)
> 
> Peter
> 
> 
> 
> 


Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com

This message contains confidential information and is intended only 
for the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you 
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this 
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.

E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free 
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, 
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore 
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents 
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If 
verification is required please request a hard-copy version.  This 
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be 
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or 
related financial instruments.

Reply via email to