At 05:25 μμ 8/1/2002 +0100, you wrote: >On 5 Jan 2002, at 14:57, Phoebus R. Dokos wrote: > > > Hi all, >(Q60 being cheaper than a windows PC + QPC) > >Hmm, but what about the case where you HAVE to have a PC >already? > >Then QPC does seem a cheaper way ....
I do totally agree with you, the point I was making was regarding why someone should invest (provided other reasons didn't exist) to a PC in order to do QL work... :-) For portable use too is (right now) the only option. If a QL user (again IMHO) wanted to get a PC with Linux then he/she could have the same results with a Q60 and at the same time supporting the platform AND getting a real hardware QL based machine :-) That's all Phoebus
