How about documenting them when they are changed, with responsibility on the developer making the changes? New code submissions could be accepted only with proper documentation; standards determined by the 'steering committee'.
Ian. > -----Original Message----- > From: marcel > Sent: 15 March 2002 10:39 > To: ql-users > Cc: marcel > Subject: Re: [ql-users] Open source > > > Phoebus Dokos wrote: > > I think that the Open SMS project should begin, by going through the > > sources and completely documenting them first and then > start doing changes > > to bring all the versions on all the machines to the same level. > > There are about 2000 source files. Who's going to do this? No, I > certainly won't. > > Marcel > > Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This message is provided for informational purposes and should not be construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments.
