On 26 Mar 2002, at 18:56, Dexter wrote: (...) > If a user already has a licensed copy of SMSQ, a developer should be > entitled to include the modified or updated version at no cost to the > user. This should be true for same version groups only - eg an upgrade > from 2.X to 3.X would be chargeable but from 2.2 to 2.3 would not. > > Thoughts?
This does seem reasonable, even though, this is not true as things stand now. Normally, a user is entitled to a "free" new version, if the previous version contains a bug that makes his version unuseable. All other versions are paid for. But I think something can be worked out - we only have to look at how thngs are being handled right now. Wolfgang
